Team Performance Improvement
One Degree helps organisations understand what gets in the way of capable people performing effectively together, then works with them to create the conditions for consistently high team performance.
An initial conversation to understand the team or organisational challenge, where performance may be getting lost, and whether One Degree can help.
Where Performance Gets Lost
In capable teams, lost performance often looks surprisingly ordinary.
Decisions get revisited instead of resolved.
Concerns are raised after the meeting, rather than in it.
Ownership becomes unclear between people or teams.
Managers spend too much time chasing agreed actions.
Standards vary depending on who's involved.
The same avoidable issues keep returning.
None of these necessarily points to a bad team.
But together, they can prevent capable people achieving as much together as they otherwise could.
Team Performance Scorecard
The Team Performance Scorecard gives you a simple way to look at the conditions influencing how effectively people work together and identify where more may be possible.
A practical assessment designed to help you look beyond whether the team is simply busy, capable or getting along.
Why Capability Isn't Enough
Organisations can recruit good people, invest in skills and have experienced leaders, yet still leave performance on the table because of the way people work together.
The individual capability already present across the organisation.
The conditions that determine whether capable people work effectively together.
The collective output created when individual capability works together effectively.
The question isn't simply whether the organisation has capable people. It's whether the conditions exist for those people to combine their capability effectively.
The KISS Team Performance Model
High performance doesn't need to be complicated. Developed by One Degree founder Andy Nisevic, the KISS Team Performance Model focuses on four conditions that influence how effectively capable people work together: Kindness, Integrity, Simplicity and Standards.
Constructive Challenge
Trust
Alignment
Consistency
The Outcome
What Better Team Performance Looks Like
Better team performance is not about making people busier or adding more process. It should help capable people achieve more together by making decisions more effectively, taking clearer ownership, following through and delivering consistently.
Issues are surfaced while they are still easier to resolve, rather than being left until they become more disruptive or expensive.
Ownership is clearer, agreed actions are followed through and less time is spent revisiting decisions that have already been made.
People are better able to question, disagree and contribute without constructive challenge becoming personal or being avoided altogether.
Individuals and teams have a stronger shared understanding of what matters most, reducing competing priorities and unnecessary activity.
Expectations are clearer and upheld more consistently, rather than changing depending on the person, team or situation involved.
More responsibility sits where it should, with stronger follow-through and less management time spent checking, reminding and correcting.
The Commercial Outcome
When capable people work together more effectively, the impact should ultimately be visible in stronger delivery, more productive work and improved organisational and commercial performance.
Team Performance in Practice
One accountancy practice invested in the Team Performance Improvement Programme to understand what was getting in the way of effective team performance and help its people work more effectively together.
Anonymous Client Case Study
The practice measures performance partly through billability: the proportion of time spent completing client work that can actually be billed. Before the programme, average billability was 65%. Within two months, the practice reported an increase to 75%, alongside significant improvements in commercial output and progress through year-end work.
A 10 percentage-point increase in the proportion of work being completed within billable time.
The practice reported approximately £200,000 more billing per month during the period in which billability increased.
The team reported being 50% further through year-end work than they would normally expect to be at the same point in the year.
What We Worked On
DISC training helped the team better understand different working and communication preferences.
Team coaching identified the obstacles affecting performance and created a practical plan for addressing them.
1:1 director coaching supported implementation, including the difficulties and decisions that naturally arise when ways of working begin to change.
Total investment in the Team Performance Improvement Programme
£5,237 + VAT
Results are client-reported. The organisation is not named in order to protect client confidentiality. The figures show the performance reported during the programme and should not be interpreted as a guarantee of identical results for other organisations.
The Next Step
The question is whether that capability is translating into the level of collective performance it could. A Team Performance Conversation is an opportunity to look at what you're seeing across the team or organisation, what may be getting in the way, and whether One Degree can usefully help.
An initial conversation to understand the situation, explore what may be affecting performance, and decide whether there is a sensible next step.